Residential liability coverage is where most Los Angeles bite payments come from, and state regulation puts calendar dates on the insurer's side of the file. Those dates are published, and they are worth knowing before the first letter arrives.
Call (213) 953-1047No obligation · Written for Los Angeles · Los Angeles County
Six boxes, about thirty seconds. You pick when to be called back, and that is when the phone rings.
Or call (213) 953-1047In a city where the owner-occupied housing unit rate stands at 36.3 percent for 2019 to 2023 with 1,419,663 households (QuickFacts, Los Angeles city), the dog and the building frequently belong to different people, each with separate insurance. A resident's renters policy may respond for the animal's owner. A building owner's policy responds for the building owner, on the different duty stated in Civil Code section 1714 rather than the statutory rule in Civil Code section 3342, which speaks only to the dog's owner. Identifying which carrier is answering for which person, in writing, prevents a single conversation from being treated as coverage for everyone involved.
California's Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations set deadlines. Under title 10, section 2695.5 of the California Code of Regulations, an insurer receiving notice of claim must, immediately but in no event more than fifteen calendar days later, acknowledge receipt unless payment is made in that period, provide necessary forms, instructions and reasonable assistance including specifying what is required for proof of claim, and begin any necessary investigation. The same section requires a licensee receiving a communication from a claimant that reasonably suggests a response is expected to furnish a complete response within fifteen calendar days, and it provides that an insurer may not require written notice of claim unless the policy or an endorsement says so.
Section 2695.7 requires that, upon receiving proof of claim, an insurer accept or deny the claim in whole or in part immediately but in no event more than forty calendar days later, with the amounts accepted or denied documented in the file unless the claim is denied entirely. Where more time is needed, written notice of the need for additional time must go out within that same period, specifying the additional information required and any continuing reasons for the inability to decide, and that written notice must then be provided every thirty calendar days until a determination is made or notice of legal action is served. A denial or rejection of a third party claim, or a dispute about liability or damages, must be in writing.
The same section addresses what happens after a claim is accepted. Upon acceptance in whole or in part and, when necessary, upon receipt of a properly executed release, the insurer must tender payment or otherwise act to perform its claim obligation immediately but in no event more than thirty calendar days later, and the amount tendered is the amount the insurer accepted. Where multiple coverage is involved and the payee is known, accepted amounts are to be paid within the same thirty days if payment would terminate the insurer's known liability under that coverage, unless impairment of the insured's interests would result.
Subdivision (g) of section 2695.7 states that no insurer shall attempt to settle a claim by making a settlement offer that is unreasonably low, and lists factors considered in that assessment: the extent to which the insurer considered evidence submitted by the claimant to support the value of the claim, legal authority or evidence made known to it or reasonably available, the advice of its claims adjuster as to the amount of damages, the advice of counsel about a substantial likelihood of recovery in excess of policy limits, the procedures used to determine property damage, and the probable liability of the insured together with the likely jury verdict or other final determination. The statutory backdrop is Insurance Code section 790.03, which defines unfair methods of competition and deceptive acts in the business of insurance.
Three dated agency records commonly exist alongside a residential claim, and they were written by people with no stake in it. The County bite report, which County Veterinary Public Health explains does not itself deem an animal dangerous and must be supplemented by a separate report to local animal control if a resident believes the animal is dangerous (Reporting Animal Bites). The quarantine record, described in the County rabies manual under County Code section 11.04.210 as at least fourteen days and ten for dogs and cats, with home confinement or a licensed boarding kennel permitted under section 11.04.220 (quarantine provisions). And any City dangerous-animal file generated under Municipal Code section 53.34.4.
First, an insurer's evaluation is not the legal measure of loss. That measure is in Civil Code section 3333, covering all the detriment proximately caused whether or not it could have been anticipated. Second, where several parties are blamed, Civil Code section 1431.2 confines each defendant's share of the non-economic damages to that defendant's own allocated percentage of fault, so two carriers evaluating one incident are not evaluating identical exposure.
Regulatory timelines govern insurer conduct. They do not extend the time to file suit. Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1 sets two years for a personal injury action, and where a public agency is involved, the claim-presentation rule numbered 911.2 in the Government Code calls for a written claim inside six months of accrual.
This page summarizes published regulations, statutes and agency guidance for general information. It is not legal advice and does not interpret any policy. Questions about specific correspondence belong with the attorney who advertises on this site.
Homeowners Insurance Dog Bite Lawyer in Los Angeles. Call (213) 953-1047 and a Los Angeles lawyer reviews the claim and the deadline that applies. Nothing is signed on that call.
Call (213) 953-1047Los Angeles Municipal Code section 53.06.2 requires a dog off its keeper’s premises to be under a competent person’s control on a substantial chain or leash no longer than six feet, except for the stated dog exercise or training-area exception.
Why it matters: For a bite on a City sidewalk, street, or common area, the exact location and restraint details may be evidence worth preserving; this City rule is not automatically the rule for every County address.
Source: codelibrary.amlegal.com
Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control says its Dangerous Dog Investigations Unit investigates reported dog bites and attacks. An investigating officer may prepare a petition for an administrative hearing officer, who may impose conditions or restrictions and, in some cases, order euthanasia.
Why it matters: A dangerous-dog case is a public-safety process that can generate records, but it is separate from the Public Health report and from a civil injury claim.
Source: animalcare.lacounty.gov
A Public Health Reports study using Los Angeles County Department of Public Health surveillance data recorded 23,103 reported dog bites from 2009 through 2011, 88% of 26,169 reported animal-to-human bites; Pasadena, Long Beach, and Vernon were excluded because they had separate health departments and rabies-control protocols.
Why it matters: The dated data shows why the correct reporting jurisdiction matters and why an incident record should identify the exact city and agency rather than use “Los Angeles” as a catch-all.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No obligation · Written for Los Angeles · Los Angeles County