In City parks the leash rule is not a single rule. It changes by park, by fenced area, and at two locations by the hour, which is why the place a park attack happened is a factual question worth pinning down immediately.
Call (213) 953-1047No obligation · Written for Los Angeles · Los Angeles County
Six boxes, about thirty seconds. You pick when to be called back, and that is when the phone rings.
Or call (213) 953-1047Municipal Code section 63.44 prohibits a person from causing, permitting or allowing an animal in a City park except in listed situations. Among them: equine animals led or ridden under reasonable control on bridle paths; dogs specially trained and used by blind or otherwise disabled persons to aid and guide them; and licensed dogs or cats led by a leash not more than six feet long, confined inside a vehicle, or licensed dogs under the control of a competent person in designated dog exercise and training areas. The ordinance treats off-leash use as the exception, tied to a specific designated place, rather than as a general privilege attaching to any open space.
The same section identifies particular locations. City parks or portions of parks approved and designated by the Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners and approved by the City Council by ordinance. Laurel Canyon Park from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and from 3:00 p.m. until park closing, every day of the week. Silver Lake Recreation Center, where dogs are permitted only inside the fenced area designated as a dog exercise and training area and nowhere else in the center. A portion of the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area of approximately ten acres on Victory Boulevard near White Oak Avenue, open at sunrise and closed at sunset. A portion of Runyon Canyon Park of approximately ninety acres inside stated distances from the Fuller Street, Vista Street and Mulholland Drive entrances, with a separate fenced portion of roughly 21,000 square feet between the Fuller and Vista entrances designated as a no dogs or cats allowed area. A 1.4-acre fenced portion of Barrington Park, outside of which dogs are not allowed at all. An enclosed portion of Knoll Hill of approximately three acres designated by the Harbor Department. An enclosed area of approximately .84 acres near the Westminster Senior Center, open sunrise to sunset.
A dog running loose thirty feet outside a fence line is in a different legal position from the same dog inside it. A dog off leash at Laurel Canyon Park at noon is outside the stated hours. A dog off leash anywhere in Silver Lake Recreation Center other than the fenced area is outside the exception by the ordinance's own words. So the first useful record from a park incident is not a description of the dog. It is a location: the park, the named area, the side of the fence, the entrance, the trail, the time on the phone that took the photograph.
Beyond parks, Municipal Code section 53.06.2 requires a dog off its keeper's premises to be under a competent person's control on a substantial chain or leash no longer than six feet, with an exception referencing the park exercise areas. Municipal Code section 53.34 separately addresses animals at large and makes the offense a misdemeanor where the animal bites, with a species ownership ban of up to three years available after conviction. Where an ordinance was violated, Evidence Code section 669 supplies a presumption of failure to exercise due care once the four listed conditions are met.
Civil Code section 3342 reaches a bite suffered in a public place regardless of the former viciousness of the animal or the owner's knowledge of it, so a park is squarely within its terms. The statute is directed at the owner, which in a park is often not the person holding the leash: a dog walker with several animals, a friend exercising someone else's dog, a family member. A claim against a handler runs instead on the ordinary-care duty in Civil Code section 1714, and identifying which person is which is easier on the day than a month later.
Park incidents generate scattered documentation. County Veterinary Public Health takes bite reports and states that the current location of the biting animal is one of the most important parts of the report, that all mammal bites are reportable except those from small rodents and rabbits, and that Pasadena, Long Beach and Vernon operate their own reporting lines (Reporting Animal Bites). A dangerous-animal report to City animal control is separate from that bite report and follows the procedure in Municipal Code section 53.34.4. Witnesses in a park are strangers; a phone number written down on the spot is often the only version of that record that will ever exist.
Compensation is measured under Civil Code section 3333 as all the detriment proximately caused, whether or not it could have been anticipated. Where several people are said to share fault, Civil Code section 1431.2 makes non-economic damages several only, allocated by each defendant's own percentage of fault, and defines economic damages as objectively verifiable monetary losses.
A general summary of published ordinances, statutes and agency guidance about dogs in Los Angeles parks. It is not legal advice and does not evaluate any particular incident. Specific questions belong with the attorney who advertises on this site.
Off-Leash Park Dog Attack Lawyer in Los Angeles. Call (213) 953-1047 and a Los Angeles lawyer reviews the claim and the deadline that applies. Nothing is signed on that call.
Call (213) 953-1047Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control says its Dangerous Dog Investigations Unit investigates reported dog bites and attacks. An investigating officer may prepare a petition for an administrative hearing officer, who may impose conditions or restrictions and, in some cases, order euthanasia.
Why it matters: A dangerous-dog case is a public-safety process that can generate records, but it is separate from the Public Health report and from a civil injury claim.
Source: animalcare.lacounty.gov
A Public Health Reports study using Los Angeles County Department of Public Health surveillance data recorded 23,103 reported dog bites from 2009 through 2011, 88% of 26,169 reported animal-to-human bites; Pasadena, Long Beach, and Vernon were excluded because they had separate health departments and rabies-control protocols.
Why it matters: The dated data shows why the correct reporting jurisdiction matters and why an incident record should identify the exact city and agency rather than use “Los Angeles” as a catch-all.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Los Angeles Municipal Code section 63.44 bars animals from City parks except in listed situations, including licensed dogs led by a leash not more than six feet long and licensed dogs under the control of a competent person inside designated dog exercise and training areas. The ordinance names specific sites, among them Laurel Canyon Park from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and from 3:00 p.m. until park closing, the fenced area at Silver Lake Recreation Center, roughly ten acres of the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area on Victory Boulevard near White Oak Avenue, about ninety acres of Runyon Canyon Park, and a 1.4-acre fenced portion of Barrington Park.
Why it matters: Whether a dog was permitted to be off leash at the moment of an attack depends on the exact park, the exact fenced area and sometimes the time of day, so the location detail in a park incident carries more weight here than a general statement about dog parks.
Source: codelibrary.amlegal.com
No obligation · Written for Los Angeles · Los Angeles County